The term "teacher accountability" has long been
uttered from various quarters, and the teachers usually see red when they hear
the term because a disproportionate percentage of those who use the term have
some sort of agenda which is hostile to the teachers. A number of years ago, when I served on the
board of a Jewish day school, there were many an anguishing moments involving
the question of teacher accountability.
I am all for teacher accountability, but teacher
accountability is meaningless unless there is administration accountability,
school board accountability, student accountability and parent
accountability. If you are not pushing
for accountability for all, then chances are that you have some sort of ulterior
anti-teacher motive when you say the words "teacher accountability."
New York State has recently instituted a new system for evaluating
teachers. It is called the Annual
Professional Performance
Review.
The teachers unions are, of course, against it, and while I
normally do not side with the teachers unions on too many matters, I really,
really am most skeptical at the entire concept behind the APPR. Teacher effectiveness is difficult to
quantify.
If my teachers were
effective in teaching me, they were effective because they were given nearly
absolute backing from my parents (the few exceptions were for good cause, including
an instance where a certain vice-principal made an illy-veiled anti-Semitic
remark to my Mom, and then wondered why I continued to have a piss-poor
attitude about school for the remainder of the school year).
The APPR system requires teachers to submit various data and
documents to the evaluators, who will then use those documents to rate the
teachers.
But Craig
Charvat, a teacher
at Center Moriches High School on Long Island who has 15 years of experience
and a known track record and reputation, refused to submit any documents. He did it as a protest against the APPR
system. Because he failed to submit the
required materials, he was rated as Ineffective. And he has stepped forward to identify
himself to the public.
One problem with the educational system is that it now
teaches students what to think instead of how to think. I do not know what Craig Charvat's politics
are. What I do know is that the best way
to teach is by example; actions speak louder than words. Craig Charvat's actions are effectively teaching
his students (whether enrolled in his classes or otherwise) that one need not
let "the system" do the thinking for them. Craig Charvat's actions are teaching his
students that sometimes one must take risks by standing up for what one
believes. Craig Charvat's actions are
teaching his students that the governmental authorities are not infallible, and
need to be questioned from time to time.
Would that all teachers be as "ineffective" as Craig
Charvat.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home