Here we go again!
Another rabbi behaving poorly.
New York State Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman (who
reportedly goes into rage mode when referred to as "Eric
Schneiderman" without the initial "T") has just
announced the court-ordered temporary (for now) shutdown of 19 charities
operated out of Brooklyn by one Rabbi Yaakov Weingarten.
[It is with profound shame that I now admit to having personally
donated to a few of those charities, albeit only in the two figure range.].
The problem was that the 19 charities, mostly purporting to
aid needy causes in Israel, did not send any appreciable amounts of money to
those causes. Instead, during the past 5
years, there have been questionable expenditures from the charities' bank
accounts amounting to millions in the aggregate. These include utility bills, dental care, video
rentals, mortgage payments, and an Atlantic City casino trip. And let us not forget some significant home
improvements to the house owned by Weingarten's wife.
While there are no sure things here, there may well be some
criminal charges in the coming weeks or months.
And it is very tempting to speculate as to what excuses and/or
mitigational assertions might be tendered by Weingarten and/or his supporters
and sympathizers.
Two issues that have not been so visibly addressed in the
Jewish blogosphere are the following:
A. The modus operandi
of the charities has been for various individuals to make telephone
solicitations, often but not always falsely claiming that a pledge allegedly made
by the recipient of the telephone call has yet to be fulfilled. There were several telephone callers
involved, each using their personal cell phone or some other "boiler room"
phone bank. Query: What did the individual callers know and when
did they know it? How knowingly complicit
were they in Weingarten's scams? How
much did they benefit?
B. The standard line used
by the insular religious Jewish community whenever one of theirs gets foul ink
in the press is that he (or sometimes, she) is an aberration. I once heard a certain spokesman reply to a
query by a reporter regarding some poor behavior by a high school student, to
the effect that the insular Jewish community has 1 or 2, the Catholic schools
have 10, and the public schools have 100 such bad actors. This, perhaps, has some validity, though the
exact statistics may not be so exact.
But be that as it may, I have to wonder whether Weingarten is
the only player in his league. One key
reason my wife and I do not live in such communities (and have taken pains to
avoid locating ourselves in such communities) is the degree to which everyone
insinuates themselves into everyone else's personal business. Therefore, if Weingarten is living such a
charmed lifestyle, it surely has been noticed.
And neighbors and friends desirous of such a life would naturally
attempt to emulate Weingarten's means of supporting such a modus vivendi.
And how could a major trip to an Atlantic City casino escape
notice?
If Weingarten and his cohorts were not shunned by the
community, then it would not astonish me in the least if there are a few more
just like him.
A little more than a year ago, I publicly stated at a
certain conference that I expected some sort of financial scandal to arise involving some
charitable organizations within the insular religious Jewish community. Painful as it is, I must now thank New York
Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman for vindicating me from the naysayers at
that conference.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home