The more
that comes out about Kaci Hickox, the more questionable she becomes.
But
neither should the government be excused from all questions in its handling of
Kaci in particular, and of Ebola in general.
The Maine
health officials had sought a court order to compel Kaci to distance herself from
others by at least three feet for the duration of the 21-day incubation
period. Had the order been granted, Kaci
would have been allowed to go biking or jogging outside. In my opinion, that struck a reasonable balance
between public safety concerns and Kaci's Constitutional rights.
But,
as just about every non-comatose American knows by now, the judge ruled against
the State of Maine and Kaci now has no movement restrictions.
I
am, of course, concerned for the health of the population of Maine no less than
I am for the Constitutional rights of Kaci Hickox. If Hizzonor called that one wrong, and Kaci
actually comes down with Ebola, then not only will the people of Maine and
beyond be in danger for their health, but the Constitutional rights of everyone
will be imperiled from what will be the reluctance of any court anywhere in
America to take chances.
So I
now wait and see, and pray for the health of Kaci Hickox.
I do have one
question for the Maine Center for Disease Control & Prevention, however. You people were so quick to lawyer up and go
to court to try to restrain Kaci's movements.
You tried to keep her at least 3 feet away from everyone. But what about Kaci's boyfriend, Ted
Wilbur? Why didn't you try to impose
similar restrictions upon him? How sure
are you that Ted has been keeping 3 feet away from Kaci? If he has been getting closer than 3 feet, then
is he not also a menace to the public health?
Methinks that
your Ebola management program is too light on public health, and too heavy on
politics.
Labels: Constitutional Rights, Ebola, Kaci Hickox
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home