Marie Baran is one of the remaining defendants in a Long
Island Railroad
pension
fraud scheme (some of the other defendants having taken plea agreements).
Her testimony at her trial
was
reported in today's Newsday.
Marie
had been the District Office manager for the Railroad Retirement Board, and, almost
immediately upon her retirement from that Federal agency, set up shop in the
free office space provided in the LIRR workers' union headquarters as a
consultant to advise LIRR employees how to put in the papers to get their
disability pensions and retire early.
Her own husband is an ex-LIRR worker on disability.
She charged the LIRR workers she advised
$1,200 each as a consulting fee.
Marie admitted to amending her income tax return to reflect
more than $50,000 additional income after she received a visit from the FBI. She claimed that she insisted on cash payments
because she didn't want to have to worry about bounced checks, and that hiding
income was the furthest thing from her mind.
She further claimed that the $50,000 + underreported from
her initial return was an honest mistake.
" 'I wasn't very good at this business stuff,' she testified. 'I
didn't keep records the first year. When I did my taxes, I just winged it.'"
I wasn't there; I only know what I read in Newsday. The judge and jury are best postured to
evaluate the testimony of the witnesses, and I do not now purport to
second-guess them. Nevertheless, I shall
exercise my First Amendment rights and proffer my personal opinion:
Marie, if you held the union members in such high regard as
you claimed (hey, they did, after all, give you some rent-free office digs),
why couldn't you trust them to write good checks to you? And Marie, you were not a GS-5 automaton, you
were the freakin' District Office Manager of the RRB's Long Island Office! This "business stuff" couldn't have
been all that strange to you! In fact, you couldn't have lasted more than a few weeks as District Office Manager if you were totally clueless about "this business stuff!"
I'm sure that the GS-3s, GS-4s and GS-5's I had occasion to
supervise during my Federal employment years (who, notwithstanding their low
scope of authority, job functions and salaries, were certainly not
automatons) would not have missed the $50K+ discrepancy you claimed was an
innocent error. They understood
"this business stuff!"
Marie, I think that you now stand a good chance of getting some rent-free
housing from the Federal government! In
a Big House!Labels: Long Island Railroad, Pension fraud, Tax fraud
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home