Now the latest diversion for the insular religious Jewish
community is the case of Menacham "Max" Stark, who was abducted and
whose body was found, smoldering in burning ashes, in a dumpster at a gas
station. Tragic enough. But the real controversy, which has really
taken the matter viral, is that the New York Post ran it on their front
page with the headline "Who Didn't Want Him Dead?" This, of course, has caused
much anguish to the late Mr. Stark's family, over and above that of the
circumstances of his brutal murder. Now,
there is much
dissatisfaction brewing with the New York Post. And the politicians are having a field day.
My comments:
1. Number One, First
and Foremost: I. Did. Not. Want. Him. Dead.
2. I have never dealt
directly with Mr. Stark, but I do have some friends and acquaintances who
have. While I regret his passing, and
the brutal manner in which it came about, I cannot say that I regret not having
had occasion to meet him. He apparently
(read "definitely") was a slumlord who did dirty to tenant and
contractor alike. His property
management practices drew much attention from the many cognizant administrative
agencies in the bloated New York City government bureaucracy.
3. I shall not now
speculate on who the murderer(s) may be.
There are several (read "copious") possibilities and motives
from amongst a broad spectrum of individuals (which is the very point the New
York Post was really trying to make). Anything
is possible, including a plurality of Stark's enemies got together and followed
the script of an Agatha Christie novel.
Let the police detectives and investigators do their thing, and let the
chips fall where they may! And let the perps be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
4. The New York Post
exhibited abysmally poor taste in presenting the story. Even by their own standards.
5. However, I cannot
help but note that many of those who now condemn the New York Post for its
sensationalism have themselves been party to oversensationalizing other
matters.
6. I absolutely feel
bad for Menachem Stark's family. His
children are innocent victims, and, unless and until shown otherwise, I shall
presume that his widow is also an innocent victim and was not complicit in his
nefarious enterprises.
7. Stark is being
touted amongst the insular Jewish community as a humanitarian who was very
generous with his millions of dollars to help the needy of the community. All well and good, but if the money was
stolen then it wasn't kosher.
8. The most troubling
aspect of this all -- no less troubling than the crime itself -- is a failure
by the leaders of the insular Jewish community to acknowledge that, independent
of his victimhood, Stark's hands were
dirty. Filthy dirty! This sends the wrong message to their
children.
9. Query: Will those who are screaming for blood change their tune if it turns out that the perp was one of their own?
10. No, I am not a fan of Menachem Stark. Nevertheless, I did not want him dead.
Rest in Peace, Menachem Stark!
Labels: crime, Menachem Stark, Religious Jews Behaving Poorly, Sensationalism
2 Comments:
At 08 January, 2014 10:48, Robert the Biker said…
It sounds to me like he picked the wrong guy or group of guys *ahem* mobbed up *ahem* to piss off. Sometimes people fail to realise that they can be the biggest baddest fish in the pond, but there can be a larger pond they would have been very wise to stay out of. Police are looking for suspects; in those neighbourhoods? Throw a brick!
At 08 January, 2014 21:09, Expatriate Owl said…
Robert, more developments are surfacing daily if not hourly in this case. Still too early to call this one, but I would not be the least surprised if it involved his partner and/or the Satmar Rebbi.
Just speculating.
Post a Comment
<< Home