There
has been much to catch up on since my wife and I returned from Israel almost
two weeks ago, so I haven't been posting.
I have already done two
out-of-town excursions since then (home in time for late dinner), and a few
more are planned for me in the coming weeks, and my wife is out of town today
for the day.
For
reasons not yet appropriate for discussion, the litigation I am conducting has
taken a subtle but interesting twist, even as I work on writing the legal memo
for the Judge.
And
today is my first day back to teach for the semester, with its usual attendant
first-day-of-the-semester dysfunctions (which, thankfully, have been quite
minor thus far).
Though
I have some very strong opinions on the events now transpiring in Israel and in
the world, most of those views have been more than adequately expressed by
others elsewhere, and will not now be given the "me, too," other than
to give a perfunctory "me, too."
And
the one matter I do, at this moment, feel a strong compulsion to comment upon,
does not warrant much in the way of comment because it speaks for itself:
If
the UN does nothing, then it (A) shows the futility of depending upon UN
"peacekeepers," and if the UN uses force then that leaves a wide opening for Israel to do
likewise, in spades – if Netanyahu has the baytzim to act.
So
if the blue helmet does not guarantee the safety of the peacekeeper soldier, it
is because the UN is not the neutral party it is touted to be.
Labels: Israel, Military, Muslim terror, United Nations