Judge Deborah Batts, a Federal judge who sits in the
Southern District of New York, has allowed Jonathan Bristol, the disbarred
former partner at Winston & Strawn who used his attorney escrow account to
launder money in a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme, to walk away
with no
prison time.
One would think that a partner at such a prestigious large
international law firm who so misbehaved would get some slammer time, or, if
not in a slammer-type facility, a year or two at a low- or minimum-security Club
Fed institution such as Allenwood or
Morgantown.
But Judge Batts bought off on the sob story arguments of Bristol's
lawyer, Susan Kellman, who tugged at Batts's heart strings with the stories of
Bristol's troubled childhood, and his treatments for depression, and the fact
that his downfall wrecked his marriage and now leaves him living alone in a
small 1-bedroom apartment with his dog.
Judge Batts agreed that Bristol's "hero worship"
of now disbarred attorney-CPA Kenneth I. Starr (not to be confused with the former
Solicitor General and Judge, Kenneth W. Starr), beclouded his better
judgment. Starr's retinue of celebrity
clients such as Martin Scorsese, Uma Thurman, Lauren
Bacall, Nora Ephron and Matt Lauer, reasoned Bristol, would enhance his law
practice.
There are reasons for judges to impose below-range
sentences. Bristol did enter a plea
deal, thereby sparing the time and resources of the courts and the U.S.
Attorney's office. And, in all fairness,
it must be noted that Batts did hold Bristol jointly and severally liable, with
Starr, for the $18 million that passed through his escrow account (but not
until Starr kicks in past the $5 million threshold).
The chances of Bristol and/or Starr attaining such wealth
are not something I would lay any wager to. Bristol is certainly ruined financially in a huge way.
But what kind of lesson does the example of Jonathan Bristol
teach? That getting caught up in hero
worship is a valid excuse? If so, why
not the followers of Charles Manson? Will
the next arrogant snot-nosed big New York law firm partner who gets caught in a
big financial fraud (and there will be a next one, mark my words) invoke Bristol's
excuses of hero worship?
Yes, I can see where Judge Batts's dispensation of mercy is
sparing the penal system the strain of having to accommodate Bristol. I can see where Bristol is already consigned
to a life of suffering (though being privileged to live with a canine companion
is certainly not anywhere near the hottest region of the netherworld
inferno). Yet, somehow, I am
uncomfortable about the whole thing.
Adding to my discomfort is that the sentencing proceeding was done "before a
jury box full of elementary school students from the Aaron School, a K-12
special education school in Manhattan, who were there to learn about the court
system." Which aspect of
Bristol's sentence will those kids absorb, the financial ruination, or a sense
of entitlement to mercy from the courts for yielding one's own locus of control
to the hero one worships?
I am informed that tomorrow is a date of religious significance for my Christian friends. In the event that I don't post anything further before then, let me now wish to all of you, a Merry one!!!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home