The American Academy of Pediatrics publishes a
journal whose title, to the surprise of few, is "Pediatrics." Their latest issue includes a Policy
Statement entitled "The
Crucial Role of Recess in School."
I agree with MOST of what is in the Policy
Statement, but vehemently beg to differ with their assertion that "In
essence, recess should be considered a child’s personal time, and it should not
be withheld for academic or punitive reasons."
It must be disclosed that during my grade
school years, on account of certain of my personal childhood propensities, yes,
I did spend many a recess period sitting at my desk or in the principal's
office. And my teachers, no doubt, would
agree that I right well deserved those disciplinary disengagements.
This is yet another descent down the slippery
slope of entitlements. Sending the child to the principal's office in lieu of recess
teaches the lesson, and instills the value, of the relationship between rights
and responsibilities. Making recess the
child's "personal time" which cannot "be withheld for academic
or punitive reasons" can only give the troublemaking brat another entitlement
to exploit, and does not facilitate the development of taking responsibility
for his or her actions.
I hold pediatricians in high regard as a
profession, and most of the ones I know in high regard as persons. But when they stray from their area of
expertise, they can cause all kinds of troubles and complications.
Labels: Brats, Discipline, Entitlements, Pediatricians, Recess
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home