I have long been an environmentalist. No, not THAT kind of environmentalist! I mean a REAL environmentalist!
I have been recycling glass, plastics and paper, and
composting vegetable matter in my garden, for well over 40 years.
At some time between the administrations of Teddy Roosevelt
and Lyndon Johnson, the Leftists hijacked the cause of a clean and healthy
environment. And, if there be full
disclosure, I myself bought off on that perverted version of it during my liberal
days.
But part and parcel of my disillusionment with the Left
included (but in no way was limited to) the fact that the facts didn't jibe
with the rhetoric. Some of the most
significant environmental legislation was enacted during the Nixon and Ford
administrations, for example. And, unfortunately, Ronald
Reagan's one major failing was his forsaking of the Republican Party's
pro-environment stance.
I remember, for example, that when I was in kindergarten and
elementary school, I would collect empty
soda bottles and redeem them at the grocery store -- 2 cents for the small ones
(10 oz or 16 oz) and 5 cents for the larger ones. They were ALL glass in those days, the
polyethylene terephthalate plastic not yet having been put to its now familiar
use in beverage containers.
But then, one day, the grocer declined to redeem a bottle I
presented to him. He showed me that the
bottle bore the legend "No Deposit No Return." Someone realized that by altering the design
of a soda bottle so that it didn't use as much glass, it was cheaper to use
brand new bottles each time, instead of having to clean and sterilize the
returned ones. The beverage bottlers
caught on, and no longer conditioned the sale of their wares upon the return of
the bottles. The consumer would just
throw the empty glass bottle into the trash, and it would go to the landfills
with the rest of the trash. Beverage
purveyors were actually boasted of "No Deposit No Return" in their
advertising.
But a while later, someone realized that just because the environmental
cost of the bottles in the landfills doesn't appear anywhere on the beverage
industry's balance sheet doesn't mean that there is no environmental cost. And as the municipalities found that the
taxpayers were in fact bearing the cost of the exhausting landfill capacities. And so, the various states began to enact
beverage container return statutes. As
one who regularly returns the beverage containers to the reverse-vending
machines, this suits me fine.
And, of course, I put my recyclables out at the curb on
collection days. Where I live, it is
paper and cardboard one week, and plastic, glass and metal cans the other
week. Once New York enacted the beverage
return law, which was shortly after my wife and I relocated here, there was a
noticeable (though by no means complete) reduction in the beverage container litter
on the roadways and in the parks, et cetera.
My then 7-year-old son took to collecting the returnable bottles in
order to supplement his income.
And so, today, I went to the Post Office. Our Post Office has its regular wastebaskets,
and also the blue Paper Recycle containers which bear the recycle legend and
logo. While going through my stack of
mail, the janitor came by with his wheeled trash can, making his 1:00 PM rounds
to empty the trash. I stood to the side so
that he could access the wastebasket beneath the counter where I was sorting
through my mail.
Noticing the pile of papers from the junk mail and other
extraneous cellulose matter from the contents of my P.O. Box, he asked me,
"Is that trash?"
"It's for the paper recycle," I answered.
"Don't worry about it," he told me. "I just put it all in the can and it all
goes into the same dumpster!"
Query: Why should I
bother to take the time to bust my beitzim separating the recyclable from the
non-recyclable if it all gets put into the same trash bin and goes to the same
dump or incinerator?
At my local Post Office, all of the pretenses of recycling
to protect the environment are a bunch of manure!
Labels: composting, environment, recycling
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home