Embezzlement is a serious offense in any instance, and
embezzlement from a religious or charitable organization is all the more
serious because the people who donate money to such organizations have certain
high expectations, both of the organizations themselves and the people who run
them. Thus, not only are the organizations
and their intended recipients of their beneficence victimized by the
embezzlement. The donors, who made their
donation with no expectations of profit in exchange for the risk (other than a tax
deduction, which Obama has significantly reduced), are victims in a way that
investors in the securities market can never be.
It is, of course, a sad day for the Jewish
people when the organization from which money is embezzled is a synagogue. And we now have one of those sad days.
Ex-attorney Isaac Zucker, former Treasurer of
Congregation Aish Kodesh in Woodmere, New York, has pleaded
guilty to embezzling more than $600,000 from the shul. I say "ex-attorney" because under New
York Judiciary Law ยง
90(4)(a), an attorney who is convicted (and, a fortiori, who pleads guilty)
to a felony offense automatically is disbarred upon the event. He faces a maximum of 7 years in the slammer.
My comments, in no particular order:
1. I
know some people connected with Aish Kodesh, and have, over the past few
months, been made privy to a small amount of inside details regarding this
matter.
2. Like
so many other social groups, whether ethnicities or junior high athletic teams
or anything in between, we Jewish people have a strong tendency to protect our
own, and an aversion to involving outsiders in the process of righting wrongs
within the group. In this case, after
the theft was discovered, the Aish Kodesh leadership had attempted to work out
a deal with Zucker to get the money returned, and only went to the authorities
after it became clear that such attempts would be futile.
I
have mixed feelings about this. On one
hand, there needs to be a tough stance taken against embezzlers. On the other hand, the District Attorney's
office regularly engages in plea bargaining, which, in many respects, differs little
in concept from trying to work out a private deal for restitution.
3. It
will be interesting to see what type of sentence is advocated by the membership
and leadership of Aish Kodesh in the sentencing process. What will their letters to the Judge
say? What will the victim impact
statements say? And what type of
consonance or dissonance will there be between such statements, and the
statements the same people made with respect to certain notorious cases
involving various Jewish criminals convicted of crimes such as bank fraud,
child molestation and cop-killing?
Labels: Attorney discipline, crime, embezzlement, synagogues
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home