I have long been very chary regarding the Jewish Defense
League. Having attended a junior high
school where the Jewish kids were countable on the fingers of both hands even
after my sister and I transferred in, I do understand firsthand the need for an
able-bodied Jewish kid to resort to physical measures in dealing with
bullies. Done correctly, certain
countermeasures can put a stop to the bullying, as indeed, they did for
me. The prospect of supportive
confraternity ostensibly offered by the JDL can be very enticing indeed,
especially to the Jewish youth who has experienced anti-semitic verbal taunts
and worse.
But I saw early on that what the JDL stands for on paper is not
what the JDL always brings into actualization, and so declined over the years a
number of invitations to join.
Specifically, the JDL has a special draw for misfits in Jewish society
who, for all of their pride and concern for their fellow Jews, fail to properly
discern the time and place to employ -- and not to employ -- physical
violence. Too many times,
overzealousness has been very misdirected, to the discredit of the JDL and the
Jewish community at large.
And unfortunately, Rabbi Meir Kahane, the founder of the JDL,
condoned such intemperance overly much.
Accordingly, while I have had occasion to cooperate with some of the
more rational and reflective members of the JDL in matters of valid concern (e.g.,
providing a physical presence on "Mischief Night" at the home, located
in an overwhelmingly anti-semitic neighborhood, of a widow whose adolescent
daughter had already been attacked, and whose windows had already been broken),
I have never cast my lot with joining the JDL as a member.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, I do, from time to time,
consider a situation and wonder "What would Rabbi Kahane do?"
One such situation is in the process of occurring at
Brooklyn College. A group of pro-Arab
and anti-Israel activists are now slated to present a one-sided program for
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel on the Brooklyn. The Department of Political Science is a
sponsor of the event. Karen Gould, the
President of Brooklyn College, insists that "academic freedom"
requires that the program go forward (though she has yet to explain how the
boycott, ostracism and exclusion of academics from Israel because they are
Israeli constitutes academic freedom).
What would Rabbi Kahane do?
It is a known fact that much of the research and development
of Intel's computer technology has taken place and continues to take place in
Israel.
If the Political Science Department insists on supporting a
boycott of Israeli products, then maybe computers with Intel chips do not
belong in the Department's offices. How
about a mass incursion of able-bodied Jewish (or, for that matter, gentile) men and
women into the Brooklyn College Political Science Department to confiscate the
computers and walk out with them?
Perhaps that is what Rabbi Kahane would do.Labels: antisemitism, Jewish Defense League, Meir Kahane
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home