Bill de Blasio, the alleged Mayor
of New York City, together with Patrick Lynch, the President of the New York
City Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, have gotten themselves into one fine
kettle of fish.
The alleged mayor, of course, has
been hamstringing the New York City Police Department, and, in the view of many
NYPDers and members of the public (myself included), has come down too far on
the side of the lawlessness crowd.
Pat Lynch, after showing some
remarkable restraint, finally spoke for his constituency by telling de Blasio
and NYC Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito that if, G-d forbid, a NYPD
officer is killed in the line of duty, then they would be unwelcome
at the funeral, and invited his constituents to place that
sentiment in writing.
A bit hotheaded? Perhaps!
But unmitigated extremism will eventually beget counterextremism, a
sociological phenomenon analogous to Newton's Third Law.
To be sure, police forces need
checks and balances no less than any other agency of the government, and de
Blasio, as the alleged Mayor of the City of New York, is the one who needs to
provide those checks and balances while, at the same time, optimizing the
NYPD's efficacy in combatting crime and promoting law and order. He needs to either back up his boys and girls
as they do their jobs, or get rid of them; he cannot have it both ways. Now that he is allegedly a mature adult, de
Blasio needs to conduct himself as an executive, not as the Sandinista/uberleftist
he was in his younger days.
Well as of a few hours ago, it is
no longer a posturing and bluffing and pissing contest between Lynch and de
Blasio. Two New York City police
officers have
been shot dead, in cold blood, as they sat in their squad car. There is much NYPD and citizen anger that
will no doubt come to a head in the coming days. And with the breakdown and dysfunction of New
York City's governmental interactions, the City may well become more dangerous
before it becomes any safer.
Labels: Bill de Blasio, NYPD
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home