If
truth be told, I do have mixed feelings about the legalization of marijuana.
[Having
placed the subject on the table, my own personal relationship with the weed is
now fair game, so some disclosure is now in order. My personal relationship with marijuana,
entered into and departed from as a college student among other college
students, was measurable in days, and not in weeks, months, or years. The relationship was brief, and not
particularly a comfortable one. My misgivings
about it entailed finances, the rule of law, the desire to not be under the
control of others, allergies, and serious questions regarding the types of
people who were (and are) wed to the weed.
I made the decision to be a non-user of Cannabis sativa. Decades later, the decision still stands, and
has never been regretted, though it did attenuate me socially more than a few
friends and acquaintances; the only friend who truly respected my decision to
abstain from the herb is long gone, the victim of a tragic crime in which it
appears that the perpetuator's use of marijuana played a peripheral role.]
On
one hand, the weed does in fact carry many of the evils ascribed to it. On the other hand, I do subscribe, to a large
extent, to the Libertarian view that adults who smoke pot in their own homes
and who keep it there should be able to do so unmolested.
Nor
can the agricultural and marketing economics of the marijuana industry be
ignored. There are many jobs to be
supported by the legalization of marijuana.
It
seems that the push to legalize marijuana carries all kinds of side issue in
the legal arena, from taxation to firearms to employment to medical
applications, and many other matters as well.
The Congressional Research Service has laid out many of those issues
for the benefit of the Congresscritters who are addressing them.
I
am concerned. In addition to the gateway
drug argument (whose validity may or may not pertain in some or all respects),
there is now a situation where certain marijuana-related activities are legal
(and encouraged) under state law, but verboten and felonious under federal law. This give the law enforcement authorities, at
federal and state level alike, too much discretion for selectively enforcing
and applying the law.
In
an ideal world, there would be no marijuana.
But now that it is very much a part of the world, it ideally should be
decriminalized. But the world is not
ideal, and until there is a mechanism for truly holding users of the substance
accountable and answerable for their actions, if a choice must be made, I must,
with my mixed feelings, stand with the proponents of prohibition. Against the backdrop of prohibition, there is
much leeway for adjustment of penalties and establishment of rehabilitation
programs. The details shall be left to
the legislators.
Labels: marijuana
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home